Luciano Muratore

Normal Subgroups, Quotient Groups, and Automorphisms

December 10, 2025 · Luciano Muratore

So far we have seen how groups can be generated and how they can be combined. Now we turn to a more structural question: what subgroups of a group are well-behaved enough to let us form a new group out of their cosets?

Normal Subgroups

A subgroup H≤GH \leq G is called normal if it is invariant under conjugation by any element of GG, that is, if gHg−1=HgHg^{-1} = H for all g∈Gg \in G, or equivalently, if left and right cosets coincide: gH=HggH = Hg for all g∈Gg \in G.

There are several ways to recognize normality. One is that HH is a union of conjugacy classes. Another is that xHx−1⊆HxHx^{-1} \subseteq H for all x∈Gx \in G — which, combined with the finite or symmetric argument, gives equality. And perhaps the most important one: HH is normal if and only if the cosets form a group G/HG/H, the quotient group.

A simple but useful criterion is the following: if [G:H]=2[G : H] = 2, then HH is normal. The reason is purely combinatorial — there are only two left cosets (HH and gHgH) and only two right cosets (HH and HgHg), so for g∉Hg \notin H, both gHgH and HgHg must equal G∖HG \setminus H, forcing gH=HggH = Hg. The canonical example is An⊴SnA_n \trianglelefteq S_n, since [Sn:An]=2[S_n : A_n] = 2.

Normal Subgroups of S3S_3

Let us work through a concrete case. The symmetric group S3={e,(12),(13),(23),(123),(132)}S_3 = \{e, (12), (13), (23), (123), (132)\} has subgroups {e}\{e\}, ⟨(12)⟩\langle(12)\rangle, ⟨(13)⟩\langle(13)\rangle, ⟨(23)⟩\langle(23)\rangle, A3A_3, and S3S_3 itself. Of these, only {e}\{e\}, A3A_3, and S3S_3 are normal.

Why are the order-2 subgroups not normal? Because conjugation sends one transposition to another — for example, (123)(12)(132)=(23)(123)(12)(132) = (23) — so ⟨(12)⟩\langle(12)\rangle is not preserved by all conjugations. On the other hand, A3A_3 has index 2 and is therefore normal by the criterion above, and S3/A3≅Z2S_3/A_3 \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.

The Quaternion Group Q8Q_8

The quaternion group Q8={1,−1,i,−i,j,−j,k,−k}Q_8 = \{1, -1, i, -i, j, -j, k, -k\} with relations i2=j2=k2=−1i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = -1, ij=kij = k, ji=−kji = -k is another instructive example. Its center is Z(Q8)={1,−1}Z(Q_8) = \{1, -1\}, and its subgroups are {1}\{1\}, {1,−1}\{1,-1\}, ⟨i⟩\langle i \rangle, ⟨j⟩\langle j \rangle, ⟨k⟩\langle k \rangle, and Q8Q_8.

Remarkably, every subgroup of Q8Q_8 is normal. The reason is that conjugation sends any generator to itself or its inverse: for example, j⋅i⋅j−1=j⋅i⋅(−j)=−ji⋅j−1j \cdot i \cdot j^{-1} = j \cdot i \cdot (-j) = -ji \cdot j^{-1}… and one can check directly that each subgroup is preserved. The quotient groups are also illuminating: the index-2 quotients Q8/⟨i⟩Q_8/\langle i \rangle, Q8/⟨j⟩Q_8/\langle j \rangle, Q8/⟨k⟩Q_8/\langle k \rangle are all isomorphic to Z2\mathbb{Z}_2, and the index-4 quotient Q8/{1,−1}≅Z2×Z2Q_8/\{1,-1\} \cong \mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2.

Products of Normal Subgroups

If H,K⊴GH, K \trianglelefteq G, then their intersection H∩KH \cap K is normal in GG, and their product HK={hk∣h∈H,k∈K}HK = \{hk \mid h \in H, k \in K\} equals ⟨H∪K⟩\langle H \cup K \rangle and is also normal in GG. The key idea is that normality ensures conjugation preserves both HH and KK, so it preserves their product as well.

Homomorphisms

A map f:G→Hf : G \to H is a homomorphism if f(xy)=f(x)f(y)f(xy) = f(x)f(y) for all x,y∈Gx, y \in G. The kernel ker⁡(f)={x∣f(x)=eH}\ker(f) = \{x \mid f(x) = e_H\} is always a normal subgroup of GG, and the image Im(f)=f(G)\text{Im}(f) = f(G) is a subgroup of HH.

Some examples worth keeping in mind: f(x)=exf(x) = e^x is a homomorphism from (R,+)(\mathbb{R}, +) to (R>0,⋅)(\mathbb{R}_{>0}, \cdot); f(x)=eixf(x) = e^{ix} maps R\mathbb{R} to the unit circle; and f(x,y)=xf(x,y) = x is a projection from Z2\mathbb{Z}^2 to Z\mathbb{Z}.

Endomorphisms and Automorphisms of Z\mathbb{Z}

Every endomorphism φ:Z→Z\varphi : \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z} is determined by φ(1)=k\varphi(1) = k, giving φ(n)=kn\varphi(n) = kn. For φ\varphi to be an automorphism it must be bijective, which forces ∣k∣=1|k| = 1. So Aut(Z)={φ1,φ−1}≅Z2\text{Aut}(\mathbb{Z}) = \{\varphi_1, \varphi_{-1}\} \cong \mathbb{Z}_2: the only automorphisms of Z\mathbb{Z} are the identity and the inversion map n↦−nn \mapsto -n.

Inner Automorphisms

For any g∈Gg \in G, conjugation by gg defines an automorphism σg:G→G\sigma_g : G \to G by σg(x)=gxg−1\sigma_g(x) = gxg^{-1}. These satisfy σg∘σh=σgh\sigma_g \circ \sigma_h = \sigma_{gh} and (σg)−1=σg−1(\sigma_g)^{-1} = \sigma_{g^{-1}}, so the collection Int(G)={σg∣g∈G}\text{Int}(G) = \{\sigma_g \mid g \in G\} forms a subgroup of Aut(G)\text{Aut}(G), and in fact a normal one.

Now consider the map f:G→Int(G)f : G \to \text{Int}(G) defined by f(g)=σgf(g) = \sigma_g. It is a surjective homomorphism, and its kernel is precisely Z(G)Z(G), the center: g∈ker⁡(f)g \in \ker(f) if and only if gxg−1=xgxg^{-1} = x for all xx, that is, if and only if gg commutes with everything. By the First Isomorphism Theorem,

G/Z(G)≅Int(G).G/Z(G) \cong \text{Int}(G).

This is a neat result: the group of inner automorphisms is completely determined by how far GG is from being abelian.

The Inversion Map

Let me close with a small observation that ties back to what we saw about groups of exponent 2. Consider the map f(x)=x−1f(x) = x^{-1}. When is this a homomorphism?

For ff to satisfy f(xy)=f(x)f(y)f(xy) = f(x)f(y), we would need (xy)−1=x−1y−1(xy)^{-1} = x^{-1}y^{-1}. But (xy)−1=y−1x−1(xy)^{-1} = y^{-1}x^{-1}, so the condition becomes y−1x−1=x−1y−1y^{-1}x^{-1} = x^{-1}y^{-1}, which is exactly the statement that GG is abelian. So ff is a homomorphism if and only if GG is abelian — a compact way of saying that inversion reverses order, and the group only forgives that if order does not matter.