Uniqueness of Limits for Sequences and Subsequences in Metric Spaces
February 17, 2026 · Luciano Muratore
Uniqueness of Limits for Sequences and Subsequences in Metric Spaces
Let (X,d) be a metric space.
Let (xn) be a sequence in X that converges to x∈X, and let (xnk) be a subsequence of (xn) that converges to y∈X.
We prove that
x=y.
Proof
Let ε>0 be arbitrary.
We aim to show that
d(x,y)<ε.
Step 1 — Triangle Inequalities
By the triangle inequality,
d(x,y)≤d(x,xn)+d(xn,y).
Again applying the triangle inequality,
d(xn,y)≤d(xn,xnk)+d(xnk,y).
Therefore,
d(x,y)≤d(x,xn)+d(xn,xnk)+d(xnk,y).
Step 2 — Control Each Term
Since xn→x, there exists N1∈N such that for all n>N1,
d(x,xn)<3ε.
Since xnk→y, there exists N2∈N such that for all k>N2,
d(xnk,y)<3ε.
Because (xn) converges, it is a Cauchy sequence. Therefore, there exists N3∈N such that for all n,k>N3,
d(xn,xnk)<3ε.
Step 3 — Combine the Estimates
Let
N=max{N1,N2,N3}.
Then for all n,k>N, we obtain
d(x,y)<3ε+3ε+3ε=ε.
Step 4 — Conclude
Since ε>0 was arbitrary, it follows that
d(x,y)=0.
Hence,
x=y.
■
Why This Matters
This result formalizes an intuitive idea:
A subsequence cannot “escape” the limit of a convergent sequence.
It guarantees the uniqueness of limits in metric spaces and is a fundamental tool in:
- Real Analysis
- Topology
- Functional Analysis
- Compactness arguments
Without uniqueness, convergence theory would collapse.